![]() |
REED F. SIMPSON BS, MBA, CDP , REGISTERED INVESTMENT ADVISOR Specialist in Computer and Internet Technology, Software Project Management, Software Selection, Development and Implementation |
Computer/Legal Consultants, Inc. ______________________________ Coeur d'Alene, Idaho: (360) 289-2878 Seattle, Washington: (206) 905-4576 ______________________________ 5267 West Highland Drive Suite 100 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 reed@computerlegal.com www.computerlegal.com |
|
Updated: Monday, August 23, 2010 |
|
Mr. Simpson has over 39 years experience as a specialist in computer and Internet technology with a focus on project management, software systems selection and implementation, data base design and computer network systems architecture. He has been an independent consultant to industry and the legal profession since 1980. Mr. Simpson is an experienced legal consultant and expert witness with testimonial experience at deposition and trial. A summary of Mr. Simpson’s expertise includes: |
|
|
|
| Operating Systems: | |
|
|
| Data Base/Data Access: | |
|
|
| Programming Languages: | |
|
|
| Hardware: | |
|
|
| Industry Applications | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Litigation Support Experience |
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Aircraft Accident |
| Case Name: | American Airlines v. Honeywell, Jeppesen. Aircraft Accident of December 20, 1995 near Cali Columbia - American Airlines Flight 965. Ref: [400] |
| Jurisdiction: | Florida-Southern District |
| Client: | American Airlines |
| Nature Of Case: | Airline accident with issues concerning the flight control computer, the data base contained within and the many processes involved in creating the data base. Several companies and many computer systems are involved. |
| Services Provided: |
Consulting Technical expert. Analyze Flight management software development, flight data base contents and development. Review electronic records including email, CDROM, data base backup, problem logs and certification data. Analyze Flight Management Computer software version history and program source code. |
| Law Firm: | Sullivan, Johnson & Manfredi-Los Angeles, CA |
| Disposition: | Complete June 2000. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Class Action |
| Case Name: | Miller - Class Action v. Bank Of America Ref: [450] |
| Jurisdiction: | San Francisco Superior Court |
| Client: | Miller (Class Action) |
| Nature Of Case: | Miller (Class Action) claims that Bank Of America did not properly process Checking accounts with Social Security Direct Deposit activity. The class-action case, filed 5 1/2 years ago, centers on allegations that Bank of America collected some customer service fees by siphoning money from direct deposit accounts set up to receive Social Security benefits. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Declaration. Testimony at Trial. Damages Expert Designated Technical Expert concerning production of computerized account records. Design, build and operate relational data base system to analyze 50 million records produced in electronic form by Bank Of America. |
| Law Firm: | The Sturdevant Law Firm-SF |
| Disposition: | Complete February, 2004. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | ERP Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | Department 56 v. Arthur Anderson Ref: [500] |
| Jurisdiction: | Minnesota, Hennepin County |
| Client: | Arthur Anderson LLP |
| Nature Of Case: | Department 56 claims that Arthur Anderson committed fraud while assisting Department 56 in the selection and implementation of J. D. Edwards ERP software system. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Litigation Support. Review software selection process. Review project management. Review policy implications of new software system implementation. |
| Law Firm: | Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott-Chicago, IL |
| Disposition: | Complete February 2002 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | ERP Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | All Pro Sound v. Netsirk Technologies Ref: [525] |
| Jurisdiction: | Florida Circuit Court - Escambia County |
| Client: | All Pro Sound |
| Nature Of Case: | All Pro purchased SAP Business One software and contracted with Netsirk to advice All Pro on the selection and to install the SAP software. All Pro claims that Netsirk never installed SAP software thatr satisfied the business needs of All Pro. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. |
| Law Firm: | McDonald Fleming Moorhead |
| Disposition: | Pre trial discovery |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Systems Development |
| Case Name: | Tri Valley Growers v. Oracle Corporation Ref: [550] |
| Jurisdiction: | San Francisco Superior Court |
| Client: | Tri-Valley Growers |
| Nature Of Case: | Tri Valley Growers purchased a Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG) software system from Oracle Corporation. TVG alleges that the software was defective, did not meet its needs and was never completely installed. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Consulting Technical Expert. Review and evaluate Oracle management decision making process, development planning and project management. |
| Law Firm: | Dorsey & Whitney-Minneapolis, MN |
| Disposition: | Complete January 2002 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Patent Infringement |
| Case Name: | Orion IP V. Staples, Inc., et al Ref: [600] |
| Jurisdiction: | US District - Marshall TX. |
| Client: | Toyota, Harley Davidson, Home Depot |
| Nature Of Case: | Orion IP Claims Infringement of U.S. Patent 5,367,627 COMPUTER-ASSISTED PARTS SALES METHOD - Johnson |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony |
| Law Firm: | Vinson & Elkins, McDermott Will & Emery, Fulbright & Jaworski |
| Disposition: | Complete March 2006 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Service Mark Infringement |
| Case Name: | Farmers Group, Inc. v. Guerrero Ref: [650] |
| Jurisdiction: | U.S. District Court-Washington - Eastern District |
| Client: | Guerrero, Rene |
| Nature Of Case: | Farmers Insurance Group alleges that an Internet gripe site maintained by Guerrero (1) Service Mark Infringement. (2) Unfair Competition. (3) Service Mark Dilution. (4) Unfair Competition And Unfair Or Deceptive Acts. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert Expert Report |
| Law Firm: | Preston, Gates & Ellis-Spokane |
| Disposition: | Complete January 2006 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | ERP Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | Westlake Chemical Corporation and Westlake Management Services, Inc. v. Oracle Corporation, Experio Solutions Corporation and Grant Thornton LLP. Ref: [750] |
| Jurisdiction: | Texas-District Court of Harris County |
| Client: | Westlake Chemical Corporation |
| Nature Of Case: | Westlake claims that Oracle, Experio and Grant Thornton were to blame for the failed implementation of Oracle eProcurement and SAP Connector integration software. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. |
| Law Firm: | Doyle, Restrepo, Harvin & Robbins-Houston |
| Disposition: | Complete April 2003 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | ERP Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | Pioneer-Standard Electronics, Inc. v. CAP Gemini America, Inc. Ref: [800] |
| Jurisdiction: | U.S. District Court-Ohio-Northern District |
| Client: | CAP Gemini America, Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | Pioneer claims that CAP Gemini contributed to a failed IMI ESS - Oracle Financial Software Selection and Integration. Pioneer Standard claims software was defective, did not meet its needs and was implemented improperly. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Technical Expert. Designated Damages Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Testimony at Trial |
| Law Firm: | Shearman & Sterling-NYC |
| Disposition: | Complete December 2003. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | ERP Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | Berkshire Blanket, Inc. V. Independant Computer Consulting Group, Inc. Ref: [825] |
| Jurisdiction: | US District Court - Mass |
| Client: | Independent Computer Consulting Group, Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | Berkshire claims that Independant Computer Consulting Group, Inc. failed to implement Lawson ERP system within cost and schedule satisfactory to Berkshire. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert Expert Report |
| Law Firm: | Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin - Philadelphia |
| Disposition: | Complete August 2010 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Systems Development |
| Case Name: | Colorado Department of Higher Education - Colorado Student Loan Program v. Ratheon E-Systems, Inc. Ref: [850] |
| Jurisdiction: | Colorado - Denver District Court |
| Client: | Colorado Department of Higher Education |
| Nature Of Case: | Failed software development. Colorado Deportment of Higher Education claims that Ratheon failed to develop and deliver a system to process student loans for the state. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert Expert Report |
| Law Firm: | Hogan & Hartson, LLC. |
| Disposition: | Completed September 2008 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | ERP Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | Priority Healthcare Corporation v. Deloitte & Touche LLP. Ref: [900] |
| Jurisdiction: | Florida Circuit - Ninth District |
| Client: | Deloitte & Touche LLP |
| Nature Of Case: | Priority claims faulty performance by Deloitte during a Computer Software Selection and implementation involving Oracle software and Custom developed applications. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert Expert Analysis |
| Law Firm: | Holland & Knight-Miami |
| Disposition: | Complete September 2005 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Warehouse Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | TigerDirect, Inc. and Systemax V. Manhattan Associates, Inc. Ref: [950] |
| Jurisdiction: | Florida-Southern District |
| Client: | TigerDirect, Inc. and Systemax, Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | Manhattan Associates contracted with TigerDirect for the purchase and installation of a Warehouse Management System designed to handle TigerDirect high order and shipping volumes. Tiger claims that the Manhattan Warehouse for Microsoft Windows system was not capable of supporting the TiderDirect warehouse operation after the system went live. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony |
| Law Firm: | Holland & Knight - Tampa |
| Disposition: | Complete February 2007 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Systems Development |
| Case Name: | Evangelical Lutheran Church in America Board of Pensions V. Spherion Pacific Workforce Ref: [1000] |
| Jurisdiction: | US District Court-Minnesota |
| Client: | Evangelical Lutheran Church in America Board of Pensions |
| Nature Of Case: | The Board of Pensions contracted with Spherion to develop a software system to replace a legacy system. The Board of Pensions claims that Spherion produced a software system that was of little or no value and was a failed software implementation. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. |
| Law Firm: | Dorsey & Whitney-Minneapolis, MN |
| Disposition: | Complete May 2006. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Systems Development |
| Case Name: | U.S. Bank National Association (Multi Service Corporation) v. PerfectStop Partners Pier to Pier v. U. S. Bank (MO. State Court) Ref: [1050] |
| Jurisdiction: | AAA Houston, TX |
| Client: | US Bank |
| Nature Of Case: | PerfectStop developed an internet based computer system to link aircraft operators with Fixed Base Operators to coordinate trip logistics. US Bank claims that PerfectStop system was never operational. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert Expert Analysis/Designation Trial Testimony |
| Law Firm: | Dorsey & Whitney-Minneapolis, MN |
| Disposition: | Complete March 2009 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Systems Development |
| Case Name: | The Insurance House Inc. v. Insurance Data Processing, Inc. Ref: [1100] |
| Jurisdiction: | US District Court Georgia Northern District |
| Client: | Insurance Data Processing |
| Nature Of Case: | Insurance House claims breach of contract by Insurance Data Processing for the development of a computer system. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert Expert Report Deposition Testimony |
| Law Firm: | Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersall-Philla, PA |
| Disposition: | Completed August 2010 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | ERP Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | Answerthink v. Del Monte Fresh Produce Company Ref: [1150] |
| Jurisdiction: | Florida Circuit Court-Miami |
| Client: | Del Monte Fresh Produce Company |
| Nature Of Case: | Answerthink was retained by DelMonte to implement Oracle applications software in the United States and several other countries. DelMonte claims that Answerthink materially breached the agreements. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert |
| Law Firm: | Holland & Knight-Miami |
| Disposition: | Pre-Trial Discovery |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Computer Hardware/Software Development |
| Case Name: | Hewlett-Packard Company V. Factory Mutual Insurance Company Ref: [1250] |
| Jurisdiction: | U.S. District Court - NY |
| Client: | Factory Mutual Insurance |
| Nature Of Case: | HP claims significant loss due to sabotage by a former employee. Factory Mutual disputes the loss claim. |
| Services Provided: |
Consulting Technical expert. |
| Law Firm: | Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi |
| Disposition: | Complete May 2004 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Patent Infringement |
| Case Name: | Abstrax, Inc. v. Dell, Inc. and Gateway, Inc. Ref: [1300] |
| Jurisdiction: | US District Court - Eastern District Marshall Division |
| Client: | Dell, Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | Abstrax claims patent infringement by Dell of patent 6,240,328 entitled entitled “Manufacturing Method for Assembling Products by Generating and Scheduling Dynamically Assembly Instructions |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Non-Infringement Expert Expert Report Deposition Testimony |
| Law Firm: | Vinson & Elkins-Austin, TX |
| Disposition: | Complete November 2009 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Employment Age/Other Discrimination |
| Case Name: | US Equal Opportunity Commission v. Rodeway (YRC) Ref: [1310] |
| Jurisdiction: | Federal District Court - Chicago |
| Client: | US Equal Opportunity Commission - Rodeway |
| Nature Of Case: | US EEOC claims that Rodeway engaged in discriminatory practices when assigning loading and freight movement to individual employees. |
| Services Provided: |
Court Designated Neutral Expert - Data analysis/Discovery and Data B ase construction |
| Law Firm: | US EEOC - Morgan, Lewis Bockius |
| Disposition: | Completed August 2010 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | ERP Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | Computer Horizons v. Spearhead Consultants and SAP America, Inc. Ref: [1400] |
| Jurisdiction: | New York-Supreme Court - NY County |
| Client: | Computer Horizons Corp. |
| Nature Of Case: | Computer Horizons purchased SAP software system which was to be customized and installed by Spearhead Systems. Computer Horizons claims software was defective, did not meet its needs and was implemented improperly. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Consulting Technical Expert. Evaluate system requirements, technical structure, data interface, data base structure and system integration structure. |
| Law Firm: | Proskauer Rose-New York City, NY |
| Disposition: | Complete March 2001. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Theft Of Software Trade Secrets |
| Case Name: | United Computer Systems, Inc. v. AT&T and Lucent Technologies, Inc. Ref: [1500] |
| Jurisdiction: | California-American Arbitration Association-LA |
| Client: | AT&T and Lucent Technologies, Inc |
| Nature Of Case: | Computer software system, claims of capabilities and performance. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Testimony at Trial. Analysis of computer system, source code and underlying file structure and operation. Review data base structure. |
| Law Firm: | Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe-Los Angeles, CA |
| Disposition: | Complete June 1999. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Theft Of Software Trade Secrets |
| Case Name: | G5 Technologies, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation Ref: [1550] |
| Jurisdiction: | U.S. District Court - NY |
| Client: | G5 Technologies |
| Nature Of Case: | G5 claims that IBM used G5 Internet E Commerce Trade Secrets and Confidential Information for Its own benefit and to the detriment of G5. G5 claims that IBM commercialized G5's VCMS as embodied in IBM's Websphere products. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. |
| Law Firm: | Garvey Schubert Barer-New York |
| Disposition: | Complete December 2005 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Systems Development |
| Case Name: | PHARMACEUTICAL RETURNS SERVICE v. PHARMA LOGISTICS, LTD Ref: [1600] |
| Jurisdiction: | US District Court - Illinois |
| Client: | Pharmaceutical Returns Service |
| Nature Of Case: | Pharma developed a computer system to process oudated drugs for return to manufacturers. Pharaceutical Returns Service claims that Pharma used it's trade secrets to develop the system. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert Expert Report |
| Law Firm: | Bryan Cave - Chicago |
| Disposition: | Completed June 2009 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | ERP Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | University of Quebec v. SAP Canada Inc. Ref: [1700] |
| Jurisdiction: | Canada-Montreal Arbitration Tribunal |
| Client: | University of Quebec |
| Nature Of Case: | Failed SAP software implementation claimed by University of Quebec. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Testimony at Trial. |
| Law Firm: | Woods & Partners-Montreal, Canada |
| Disposition: | Complete August 2003 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | ERP Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | State Of Arkansas V. SAP Public Services, Inc. Ref: [1750] |
| Jurisdiction: | Arkansas Circuit Court |
| Client: | State Of Arkansas |
| Nature Of Case: | The State Of Arkansas contracted with SAP Public Services, Inc. for the purchase of computer software. The State Of Arkansas claims that SAP Public Services failed to provide an integrated Financial Management computer software to handle unique Public Sector requirements. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. |
| Law Firm: | State Of Arkansas - Attorney General |
| Disposition: | Complete August 2008 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Medical Billing Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | State Of Iowa vs. InfoSys, Inc. Ref: [1850] |
| Jurisdiction: | Iowa District Court-Polk County |
| Client: | InfoSys, Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | The State Of Iowa Department of Human Services claims that InfoSys provided a flawed system to perform Medical billing and processing. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. |
| Law Firm: | Holland & Knight-Chicago |
| Disposition: | Completed January 2005 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | State Medicaid Software System Implementation |
| Case Name: | Texas Department Of Health v. EDS-National Heritage Insurance Company Ref: [1900] |
| Jurisdiction: | AAA - Dallas, TX |
| Client: | EDS-National Heritage Insurance Company |
| Nature Of Case: | Texas Department Of Health claims that National Health/EDS improperly billed development and other costs. Determination of substantial completion of installed computer system. Status and significance of CMS audit of State Medicare/Medicaid System. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Trial Testimony |
| Law Firm: | Hughes & Luce-Dallas |
| Disposition: | Complete October 2004. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | ERP Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | Ocean Garden Products, Inc. v. IBM Global Services, a Division of International Business Machines Corporation Ref: [2000] |
| Jurisdiction: | US District Court-California Southern District |
| Client: | IBM Corporation |
| Nature Of Case: | Ocean Garden Products claims Breach of Contract and Fraud by IBM during the selection and implementation of the QAD ERP software to replace a non-Y2K compliant legacy system. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report.Technology consultant. |
| Law Firm: | Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges-Los Angeles, CA |
| Disposition: | Complete August 2003 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Web Site Development |
| Case Name: | Uncle Henry’s Inc. v. Plaut Consulting Inc. and Edgewing, a Division of Plaut Consulting, Inc. Ref: [2100] |
| Jurisdiction: | US District Court - Maine |
| Client: | Plaut Consulting, Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | Uncle Henry's claims Breach of Contract for the development of a classified advertising eCommerce Web Site using a Microsoft development environment. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Testimony at Trial. Internet Technology consultant. |
| Law Firm: | Lynch, Brewer, Hoffman & Sands-Boston, MA and Verrill & Dana - Portland Me |
| Disposition: | Complete April 2003. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Systems Development |
| Case Name: | La Touraine, Inc. v. Navisite, Inc., Formerly known as Jupiter Hosting, Inc. Ref: [2125] |
| Jurisdiction: | American Arbitration Association-San Francisco |
| Client: | La Touraine, Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | La Touraine contracted with Navisite to develop an Internet website Content Management System (CMS) and to host a number of websites operated by LaTouraine. LaTouraine claims that the CMS developed by Navisite was incomplete and had been misrepresented. LaTouraine claims that Navisite shut down LaTouraine websites. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report Deposition Testimony Trial Testimony |
| Law Firm: | Asaro Keagy |
| Disposition: | Complete - January 2009 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Class Action |
| Case Name: | Cornn, et. Al- Class Action. v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Ref: [2150] |
| Jurisdiction: | California-Northern District |
| Client: | Class Action Plaintiffs |
| Nature Of Case: | Plaintiffs claim that UPS failed to pay them for various classes of time worked. |
| Services Provided: |
Expert consultant Damages Data Base Expert Technical expert concerning production of computerized work and payroll records. Design, load and operate relational data base system to process and analyze 400 million records produced in electronic form. |
| Law Firm: | Kershaw, Cutter, Ratinoff & York |
| Disposition: | Complete January 2007 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | ERP Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | Styling Technology Corporation v. Arthur Anderson LLP et. al. Ref: [2200] |
| Jurisdiction: | Arizona-Superior Court Maricopa County |
| Client: | Styling Technology Corporation |
| Nature Of Case: | Styling Technology retained Arthur Anderson to design and implement Oracle financial systems. Styling claims that Arthur Anderson failed to deliver in a timely manner and when delivered, the system failed to work. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Analysis of Oracle system selection and implementation. |
| Law Firm: | Grant & Eisenhofer |
| Disposition: | Complete December 2003. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Copyright Infringement |
| Case Name: | Medinformatix, Inc. V. AcerMed, Inc. Ref: [2250] |
| Jurisdiction: | JAMS - Los Angeles California |
| Client: | AcerMED Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | Mediformatix claims that Acermed infringed it's Copyright on a Medical Office management system developed by Medinformatix when AcerMed developed a competing system. Medinformatix also claims that Acermed misappropriated its trade secrets relating to the Microsoft SQL data base used by the AcerMed system. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony Trial Testimony Review and evaluate Microsoft SQL data bases used by both systems. |
| Law Firm: | Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth-Newport Beach, CA |
| Disposition: | Complet March 2007. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | ERP Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | ChartOne, Inc. v. Netcube Systems, Inc. Ref: [2300] |
| Jurisdiction: | AAA - San Jose |
| Client: | ChartOne, Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | Failed software implementation. ChartOne alleges that Netcube failed to fulfill its obligations during an engagement involving PeopleSoft computer software. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert |
| Law Firm: | Miller Morton Caillat & Nevis-SJ |
| Disposition: | Complete June 2004 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Systems Development |
| Case Name: | Computer Business Applications, Inc. v. Melville Corporation Ref: [2400] |
| Jurisdiction: | California-Central District |
| Client: | Computer Business Applications, Inc. - Plaintiff./Cross Defendant |
| Nature Of Case: | Contracts dispute involving claims that a merchandising software system was defective. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Testimony at Trial. Review system technology, implementation issues, possible defects, corrective efforts, costs and impacts. |
| Law Firm: | Perkins Coie-Los Angeles, CA |
| Disposition: | Complete September 1994. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Class Action |
| Case Name: | Mulligan - Class Action v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company Ref: [2450] |
| Jurisdiction: | California Superior Court-Alameda County |
| Client: | Mulligan - Class Rep. |
| Nature Of Case: | PacBell is accused of erroneously charging Wire Pro inside wiring maintenance charges |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Design relational data base to collect and analyze information for 7 million users of the PacBell Wirepro service. |
| Law Firm: | The Sturdevant Law Firm-SF |
| Disposition: | Complete June 2004. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Patent Infringement |
| Case Name: | DE Technologies, Inc. v. Dell, Inc. Ref: [2500] |
| Jurisdiction: | US Virginia - Wester District |
| Client: | DE Tech |
| Nature Of Case: | De Tech claims infringement of United States Patents Nos. 6,460,020 and 6,845,364 ("the '020 Patent" and "the '364 Patent" respectively) both entitled "Universal Shopping Center for International Operation." |
| Services Provided: |
Damages Data base Consultant. Consultant for acquisition of damages data from Dell data bases. Create damages data base. |
| Law Firm: | Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi |
| Disposition: | Complete - December 2006 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Patent Infringement |
| Case Name: | Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company v. Dell, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company and Gateway, Inc. Ref: [2550] |
| Jurisdiction: | US District - Marshall TX. |
| Client: | Intergraph Hardware Technologies Company |
| Nature Of Case: | Intergraph claims infringement of it's Patent 4,899,275 entitled Cache-MMU System; Patent 4,933,835 entitled Apparatus for Maintaining Consistency of a Cache Memory with a Primary Memory and Patent 5,091,846 entitled Cache Providing Caching/Non-Caching Write-Through and Copyback Modes … |
| Services Provided: |
Damages data base data verification consultant |
| Law Firm: | Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi |
| Disposition: | Complete August 2004. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Class Action |
| Case Name: | Harp - Class Action v. Quest Communications Ref: [2600] |
| Jurisdiction: | Oregon-Circuit Court Multnomah County |
| Client: | Harp - Class Rep. |
| Nature Of Case: | Quest Communications is accused of erroneously charging roaming charges for Cellular phone calls. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Damage Calculations From Computerized Records |
| Law Firm: | Northwest Lawfirm-Portland, OR |
| Disposition: | Complete April 2005 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Copyright Infringement |
| Case Name: | IEA Software, Inc. and Community ISP, Inc. v. Whole ISP, Brian Krabach; Todd Meyers Ref: [2650] |
| Jurisdiction: | U.S. District Court-Washington - Eastern District |
| Client: | Community ISP |
| Nature Of Case: | Community ISP alleges Copyright Infringement regarding software program, data bases and text manuals. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert Expert Report |
| Law Firm: | Preston, Gates & Ellis-Spokane |
| Disposition: | Complete January 2005 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | ERP Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | Reference Pathology Services, Inc. v. Soft Computer Consultants Ref: [2800] |
| Jurisdiction: | Florida-American Arbitration Association-Tampa |
| Client: | Reference Pathology Services, Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | Failed Medical Laboratory Software implementation. Issues included system architecture, system functional capabilities, data conversion, system bugs and system reliability. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Testimony at Trial. |
| Law Firm: | Trenam, Scharf, Barkin, Fry, O'Neill & Mullis-Tampa |
| Disposition: | Complete February 2003 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Theft Of Software Trade Secrets |
| Case Name: | Move Management, Inc. v. Relocation Management Worldwide, Inc. and Armstrong Transfer and Storage Company, Inc. Ref: [2900] |
| Jurisdiction: | Colorado-Jefferson County |
| Client: | Move Management, Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | Move Management claims that Relocation Management used Move Management Trade Secrets during the development of a competing Web Site. |
| Services Provided: |
Neutral Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Review and compare Web sites, source code and SQL data bases. |
| Law Firm: | Brownstein Hyatt & Farber-Denver; Schwartz & Goldberg-Denver; Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs-Memphis |
| Disposition: | Complete December 2003. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Support Services |
| Case Name: | Verizon Business Network Services, Inc. v. AT & T Corporation Ref: [2950] |
| Jurisdiction: | AAA - New York City |
| Client: | Verizon Business Networks |
| Nature Of Case: | Verizon claims that AT & T wrongfully terminated it's contract to provide support for networks operated by At & T. |
| Services Provided: | Designated Expert |
| Law Firm: | DLA Piper |
| Disposition: | Complete- March 2008 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | ERP Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | Parrot Ice Products v. Oracle Corporation Ref: [3000] |
| Jurisdiction: | Texas-District Court of Harris County |
| Client: | Parrot Ice Products, Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | Failed software selection. Parrot Ice claims that Oracle Corporation represented that the Oracle applications software could be used to operate the business. Parrot Ice claims that the software sold to Parrot was not applicable to its business and could not be used. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. |
| Law Firm: | Doyle, Restrepo, Harvin & Robbins-Houston |
| Disposition: | Complete July 2005 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | ERP Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | Farouk Systems, Inc. v. Oracle Corporation Ref: [3050] |
| Jurisdiction: | US District Court Houston Division |
| Client: | Farouk Systems, Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | Farouk Systems claims that Oracle sold a defective ERP software system. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Technical consultant. |
| Law Firm: | Simpson & Brenner-San Diego |
| Disposition: | Complete October, 2004 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | False Advertising |
| Case Name: | Crystal Decisions, Inc. v. Actuate Corporation Ref: [3150] |
| Jurisdiction: | US Northern District-San Jose Division |
| Client: | Crystal Decisions, Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | Crystal Decisions is seeking a Preliminary Injunction to bar Actuate Corporation from making false advertising claims. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Testimony at Trial. Product capability evaluation. Expert presentation. Expert Declarations. |
| Law Firm: | Hopkins & Carley-San Jose |
| Disposition: | Complete July 2002 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Copyright Infringement |
| Case Name: | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. And Nissan North America, Inc. v. Nissan Computer Corporation Ref: [3250] |
| Jurisdiction: | California-Central District |
| Client: | Nissan Computer Corporation |
| Nature Of Case: | Nissan Computer Corporation operates an Internet website under the registered domain name of nissan.com. Nissan Motor Co. claims Copyright dilution by Nissan Computer Corporation due to its use of the nissan.com domain. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated expert. Expert report. Consulting Technical Expert. Review and analyze website traffic logs and statistics. |
| Law Firm: | Techmark-San Jose, CA |
| Disposition: | Complete November, 2002. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Theft Of Software Trade Secrets |
| Case Name: | H&S Rehabilitative Treatment Services, Inc. v. da Vinci Motion Graphics Ref: [3350] |
| Jurisdiction: | OK-Oaklahoma County District Court |
| Client: | da Vinci Motion Graphics |
| Nature Of Case: | H&S claims misappropriation of trade secrets and violation of a Non-Disclosure Agreement by da Vinci. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Testimony at Trial. Review features and functions of party's software products. |
| Law Firm: | Klinge, Brown & Roberts-Oklahoma City, OK |
| Disposition: | Complete April 2002. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Theft Of Software Trade Secrets |
| Case Name: | Computer Management Consultants, Inc. vs. Computer Information Specialist, Inc. Ref: [3400] |
| Jurisdiction: | Circuit Court - Tampa Florida |
| Client: | Computer Management Consultants, Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | Computer Management Consultants entered into a contract to sell computer software source/object code to Computer Information Specialist. Computer Management Consultants claims that Computer Information Specialist breached the contract by not completing the purchase and using knowledge gained to develop a comparable system. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. |
| Law Firm: | Trenam, Scharf, Barkin, Fry, O'Neill & Mullis-Tampa |
| Disposition: | Complete April 2006 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Theft Of Software Trade Secrets |
| Case Name: | Data Direct Networks, Inc. v. Transoft Technology Corporation Ref: [3500] |
| Jurisdiction: | Superior Court, State of California - County of Santa Barbara |
| Client: | Data Direct Networks, Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | Computer Software Trade Secrets. Data Direct claims theft of trade secrets in the form of computer software for the control of Storage Area Network (SAN) software and business plans by Transoft. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Technical consultant. Analysis of electronic discovery materials. Review and analysis of programming source code, email (including attachments) and system backup data files. |
| Law Firm: | Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe-Los Angeles, CA |
| Disposition: | Complete January 2000. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Systems Development |
| Case Name: | FlexiInternational Software, Inc. - Claimant v. Dataworks, Epicor and Platinum Software Ref: [3600] |
| Jurisdiction: | California-American Arbitration Association-SF |
| Client: | FlexiInternational Software, Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | Parties entered into a software license/development agreement. Parties dispute software development process, features implemented and development schedule. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Review project documents, evaluate management of project and contract performance. |
| Law Firm: | The Banchero Law Firm-San Francisco, CA |
| Disposition: | Complete February 2001. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Theft Of Software Trade Secrets |
| Case Name: | Multico Rating Systems v. (Name withheld by request) Ref: [3650] |
| Jurisdiction: | AAA-Washington State |
| Client: | Names Confidential |
| Nature Of Case: | Trade Secrets. Multico claims that (confidential) used proprietary information to develop competing insurance rating software. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert Expert Report. |
| Law Firm: | Preston, Gates & Ellis-Spokane |
| Disposition: | Complete January 2005 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Copyright Infringement |
| Case Name: | National Airmotive v. Oracle Corp., Avanti Systems, Inc., James Greenwood and Gregory Stachnick Ref: [3700] |
| Jurisdiction: | California-Northern District |
| Client: | National Airmotive Corporation, Rolls Royce |
| Nature Of Case: | National owns rights to computer source code. Oracle acquired code via. Former employee. National claims that Oracle is marketing a computer system which incorporated its intellectual property. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Program/system source code analysis. |
| Law Firm: | Anderson Kill & Olick - New York City, NY |
| Disposition: | Complete June 2001. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | ERP Software Implementation |
| Case Name: | Large Internet DSL Provider v. International Consulting Firm Ref: [3800] |
| Jurisdiction: | na |
| Client: | Internet DSL Service Provider |
| Nature Of Case: | International Consulting Form retained to select, modify, install and implement "back office" systems to support DSL service requirements. |
| Services Provided: |
Technical Expert. Expert Computer Consulting and analysis. Evaluate project management system, reporting and status of contract deliverables. Obtain and review machine readable project files, documents and reporting systems. Systems included Siebel, Portal, Vitria and Oracle data bases. |
| Law Firm: | Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth-Newport Beach, CA |
| Disposition: | Complete January 2002 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | eCommerce Web Site Development |
| Case Name: | Solv Corporation v. PurchasePro.com Ref: [3900] |
| Jurisdiction: | American Arbitration Association - Las Vegas, Nevada |
| Client: | Solv Corporation - Altlana, GA |
| Nature Of Case: | Solv developed software for PurchasePro.com. Solv alleges that PurchasPro wrongfully terminated contract for Internet eCommerce web site development. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Litigation Support. Review program development standards. |
| Law Firm: | Weil & Lee-Anaheim, CA |
| Disposition: | Complete September 2001. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Package Implementation |
| Case Name: | SS&C v. AF Investmentos Ref: [3950] |
| Jurisdiction: | AAA Arbitration - New York |
| Client: | AF Investmentos |
| Nature Of Case: | Portfolio Management software purchased by AF Investmentos was defective. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Consulting Technical Expert. Evaluate system requirements, technical representations and data base architecture. Review and evaluate project management system, reporting, status and performance. |
| Law Firm: | Dorsey & Whitney-Minneapolis, MN |
| Disposition: | Complete February 2001 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Package Implementation |
| Case Name: | New England Air Systems, Inc. v. ePartners, Inc. and Solomon Software, Inc. Ref: [4100] |
| Jurisdiction: | MA-State Court |
| Client: | epartners |
| Nature Of Case: | Contracts dispute involving claims that Solomon software system was defective. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Technical consultant. |
| Law Firm: | Foley, Hoag & Eliot-Boston, MA |
| Disposition: | Complete March 2002 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Systems Development |
| Case Name: | Dan Trust v. Hollie B. Smith, Jerome F. Brasch, and Horizon Healthcare Technologies Ref: [4150] |
| Jurisdiction: | Iowa District Court-Polk County |
| Client: | Dan Trusts |
| Nature Of Case: | Dan Trust purchased an ownership interest in Horizon Healthcare Technologies. Issues included software system development, project management, system quality and bug reporting and representations made when purchasing a software development company. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Litigation support. |
| Law Firm: | Dickinson, Mackman, Tyler & Hagen |
| Disposition: | Complete September 2001. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Package Implementation |
| Case Name: | Ladd Industries v. Accunet, Inc. and Solomon Software, Inc. Ref: [4200] |
| Jurisdiction: | Ohio-Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas |
| Client: | Confidential |
| Nature Of Case: | Ladd purchased Solomon Software system from Accunet. Ladd Industries claims that software was defective and was not suited for its business needs. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Consulting Technical Expert. Review and evaluate system requirements, project management and implementation results. Pre-Trial Discovery. |
| Law Firm: | Rendigs, Fry, Kiely & Dennis-Cincinnati, OH |
| Disposition: | Complete May 2002. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Systems Development |
| Case Name: | Associates in Ophthalmology v. First Insight Corp. Ref: [4250] |
| Jurisdiction: | US-Pennsylvania-Western District |
| Client: | Associates in Ophthalmology, Ltd. |
| Nature Of Case: | Software purchased for Ophthalmology group was defective and did not perform as represented. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. |
| Law Firm: | Monte & McGraw-Skippack, PA |
| Disposition: | Complete February 2002. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Internet Security/Hacking |
| Case Name: |
United States Of America v. Stephen Lynch Stephen Lynch v. Omaha World-Herald Ref: [4300] |
| Jurisdiction: | Nebraska - US District |
| Client: | Lynch, Stephen |
| Nature Of Case: | Internet Web security. Access to a protected Website without authorization causing damage. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Deposition Testimony. Review and analysis of computer hard disk, Analysis of Web Server and Firewall Logs, |
| Law Firm: | Fitzgerald, Schorr, Barmettler & Brennan-Omaha, NE |
| Disposition: |
Criminal Case Complete August 2001 Civil Suit - Complete February 2004. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Internet Pornography |
| Case Name: | State Of Washington Pl. v. Michael Leavell Def. Ref: [4350] |
| Jurisdiction: | Superior Court, State of Washington - County of Okanogan |
| Client: | M. Leavell - Defendant |
| Nature Of Case: | Internet Pornography. Unlawful Possession of Depictions of Minors Engaged In Sexually Explicit Conduct, RCW 9.68A.070 |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Expert Report. Testimony at Trial. Pre-Trial consulting. Acquisition of computer hard disk. Search for and analyze hard disk contents for email, browser cache contents and other files related to the action. Present testimony concerning the contents and validity of conclusions to be drawn from the contents of the seized hard disk. |
| Law Firm: | Roger A. Castelda, Inc., P.S-Tonasket WA |
| Disposition: | Complete November 2000. |
|
|
|
| Mediation Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Software Systems Development |
| Case Name: | Dispute over a thirty million dollar computer system that the State of Montana contends does not perform as required. Unisys, the supplier, contended that the program worked as required. Ref: [4400] |
| Jurisdiction: | State Of Montana |
| Client: | State Of Montana and UNISYS Corporation |
| Nature Of Case: | State of Montana contracted for Unisys to develop a software program to handle various taxes collected by the Montana Department of Revenue, including tracking payments and account balances and processing of refunds. |
| Services Provided: |
Mediation Support. To mediate the dispute involving damages for current delays in the project and to create a process for preventing problems in the performance of the balance of the contract. |
| Law Firm: | All Firm |
| Disposition: | Complete October 2001. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Internet Pornography |
| Case Name: | United States of America v. Anthony Marchand, M.D. Ref: [4450] |
| Jurisdiction: | U.S. District Court - New Jersey |
| Client: | Anthony Marchand, M.D. |
| Nature Of Case: | Internet Child Pornography. Technical issues presented by Ashcroft v. Free Speech Supreme Court Decision where Child Pornography created by virtual means is protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Forensic Analysis of Electronic Media Expert Report. Testimony at Trial |
| Law Firm: | Epstein, Becker & Green-Newark, NJ |
| Disposition: | Complete October 2003. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Internet Pornography |
| Case Name: | United States of America v. Ronald Elmquist Ref: [4500] |
| Jurisdiction: | US District Court - Western District of Missouri-Western Division |
| Client: | Elmquist, R. |
| Nature Of Case: | US claims that a computer siezed from Elmquist contained illegal Internet Pornography. Elmquist claims serious chain of custody issues exist with evidence. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Forensic Expert Forensic Analysis of Electronic Media Expert Report |
| Law Firm: | Wyrsch, Hobbs & Mirakain |
| Disposition: | Complete October 2009 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Internet Security/Hacking |
| Case Name: | United States Of America v. Steven Kim Ref: [4510] |
| Jurisdiction: | US District Court Houston Division |
| Client: | Steven Jinwoo KimSteven Jinwoo Kim |
| Nature Of Case: | Kim is accused of illegally accessing the electroniic records of a former employer and altering the company Oracle data base. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert Expert Report |
| Law Firm: | John Cossum ESQ. - Houston |
| Disposition: | Completed May 2010 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Employment Age/Other Discrimination |
| Case Name: | Michiko Hall v. Rockwell International Corporation Ref: [4550] |
| Jurisdiction: | Superior Court-County of Los Angeles |
| Client: | Michiko Hall |
| Nature Of Case: | Employment Discrimination. Unlawful Termination. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Document discovery requirements. Review of Rockwell operations for relevant information in order to prepare production requests. |
| Law Firm: | Dayton B. Parcells, Los Angeles, CA |
| Disposition: | Complete June 1994 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Theft Of Software Trade Secrets |
| Case Name: | Internet/Broadband Hardware/Software Co. v. IP Platform Co. Ref: [4600] |
| Jurisdiction: | California-Northern District |
| Client: | Internet/Broadband Hardware/Software Co. |
| Nature Of Case: | Key employees move to new company. Allegations involve theft of trade secrets and proprietary knowledge. |
| Services Provided: |
Consulting Technical Expert. Pre-filing. Examination of computer hard disk contents. |
| Law Firm: | Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe-Los Angeles, CA |
| Disposition: | Complete June 2002 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Theft Of Software Trade Secrets |
| Case Name: | Process Specialties, Inc. - Pl. v. Sematech, Inc. - Def. Ref: [4650] |
| Jurisdiction: | California-Eastern District |
| Client: | Process Specialities, Inc. |
| Nature Of Case: | Trade secrets |
| Services Provided: |
Technical Expert. Declaration concerning the usability of certain computer file formats as a medium for data produced during discovery phase. |
| Law Firm: | Herum, Crabtree, Brown, Dyer, Zolezza & Terpstra-Stockton, CA |
| Disposition: | Complete June 2001 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Theft Of Intellectual Property |
| Case Name: | R & R Technologies v. Westerman, Inc. Ref: [4700] |
| Jurisdiction: | Texas District Court - Nueces County |
| Client: | R And R Technologies |
| Nature Of Case: | R and R Claims that Westerman pirated computer software and designs for hardware which constituted valuable R & R intellectual property. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. |
| Law Firm: | The Wyatt Law Firm |
| Disposition: | Complete January 2006 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Employment Age/Other Discrimination |
| Case Name: | Aguiniga, Church, Aleesa , Morgan v. Hewlett-Packard Company Ref: [4750] |
| Jurisdiction: | US District-Colorado |
| Client: | Aguiniga, Church, Aleesa , Morgan |
| Nature Of Case: | Employees were terminated for allegedly violating company policy concerning the use of Email system to transmit sexually explicit material. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Review Internet communications including email, usage and policies. |
| Law Firm: | Secor Law-Denver, CO |
| Disposition: | Complete January 2001. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Computer Data Forensic Analysis |
| Case Name: | Jaramillo v. Ford Motor Co. et al Ref: [4800] |
| Jurisdiction: | California-Northern District |
| Client: | Jaramillo |
| Nature Of Case: | Ford Explorer rollover. |
| Services Provided: |
Forensic Computer Expert. Forensic duplication of computer hard disk for analysis. |
| Law Firm: | Stritmatter Kessler Whelan Withey Coluccio |
| Disposition: | Complete June 2003. |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Theft Of Software Trade Secrets |
| Case Name: | Manhattan Software v. Jean Kasem and Little Miss Liberty Ref: [4850] |
| Jurisdiction: | Superior Court-County of Los Angeles |
| Client: | Kasem, Jean and Little Miss Liberty |
| Nature Of Case: | Manhattan Software claims Misappropriation of Trade Secrets and Conversion of Internet purchasing coordination software. |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. Review computer source code and related documents. |
| Law Firm: | Krane & Smith - Encino, CA |
| Disposition: | Complete September 2002 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Theft Of Intellectual Property |
| Case Name: | Yoon Vs. Palobueno Ref: [4900] |
| Jurisdiction: | New York-Supreme Court - NY County |
| Client: | Palobueno, N.V. Ltd., Falcon Properties |
| Nature Of Case: | Evicted tenant claims damages from landlord for lost or destroyed property including computers and intellectual property (program source code). |
| Services Provided: |
Designated Expert. |
| Law Firm: | White Fleischner & Fino-NYC |
| Disposition: | Complete February 2004 |
|
|
|
| Expert Engagement: | |
| Type Of Matter: | Theft Of Software Trade Secrets |
| Case Name: | Abb Power T&D Company v. Alstom ESCA Corporation Ref: [4950] |
| Jurisdiction: | US Northern District-San Jose Division |
| Client: | Alstom ESCA Corporation |
| Nature Of Case: | Misappropriation of Trade Secrets. |
| Services Provided: |
Forensic Computer Expert. Forensic Analysis of computer hard disk contents in support of trial activities. |
| Law Firm: | Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe-Menlo Park, CA |
| Disposition: | Complete January 2003 |
|
|
|
|
Professional Associations and Achievements |
|
|